1. Basch, J. M., & Melchers, K. G. (2019). Fair and flexible?! explanations can improve applicant reactions toward asynchronous video interviews. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 5(3), 2.
2. Blacksmith, N., Willford, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2016). Technology in the employment interview: A meta-analysis and future research agenda. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 2(1), 2.
3. Cao, M., & Drasgow, F. (2019). Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(11), 1347–1368.
4. Denunzio, M. M., Marira, T. D., & Collins, L. G. (2013, August). Role-plays: See me? Hear me, assess me. Presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, Lake Buena Vista, FL.
5. Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Schneider, D. (2014). The impact of applicant faking on selection measures, hiring decisions, and employee performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(3), 479–493.
6. Dwight, S. A., & Donovan, J. J. (2003). Do warnings not to fake reduce faking? Human Performance, 16, 1–23.
7. Gibbons, A. M., & Lanik, M. (2014). Traditional and technological assessment centers: capturing the same constructs, creating the same outcomes? Paper presented at the 38th International Congress on Assessment Center Methods, Alexandria, VA.
8. Gorman, C. A., Robinson, J., & Gamble, J. S. (2018). An investigation into the validity of asynchronous web-based video employment-interview ratings. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(2), 129.
9. Griffith, R. L., & Converse, P. D. (2012). The rules of evidence and the prevalence of applicant faking. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (p. 34–52). Oxford University Press.
10. Guchait, P., Ruetzler, T., Taylor, J., & Toldi, N. (2014). Video interviewing: A potential selection tool for hospitality managers–a study to understand applicant perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 90–100.
11. Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2013). Employment interview reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by structure and format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 264–276.
12. Kuncel, N. R., Klieger, D. M., Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2013). Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1060.
13. Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Some new (and old) suggestions for improving personnel selection. Industrual and organizational psychology, 1, 343–346.
14. Lievens, F. (2001). Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 255–264.
15. Lievens, F., Keer, E. V., & Volckaert, E. (2010). Gathering behavioral samples through a computerized and standardized assessment center exercise. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9 (2), pp. 94–98.
16. Melchers, K. G., Lienhardt, N., Von Aarburg, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2011). Is more structure really Better? A comparison of frame‐of‐reference training and descriptively anchored rating scales to improve interviewers'rating quality. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 53–87.
17. Powell, D. M., & Bourdage, J. S. (2016). The detection of personality traits in employment interviews: Can "good judges" be trained?. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 194–199.
18. Sackett, P. R., Dahlke, J. A., Shewach, O. R., and Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Effects of predictor weighting methods on incremental validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 102, 1421–1434.
19. Schleicher, D. J., Day, D. V., Mayes, B. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2002). A new frame for frame-of-reference training: Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 735–746.
20. Shu, S. (2018). Debias human judgment with a common decision bias: an experimental study of the anchoring effect in hiring decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
21. Woehr, D. J., Arthur Jr, W., & Fehrmann, M. L. (1991). An empirical comparison of cutoff score methods for content-related and criterion-related validity settings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(4), 1029–1039.
22. Yu, M. C. (2018). Viewing expert judgment in individual assessments through the lens model: testing the limits of expert information processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.